Talk:Geo (microformat)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyediting
[edit]I removed the tag; I don't see anything sufficent to merit it. Tearlach 19:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Namespace
[edit]As this article deals mainly with the usage of Geo microformat in Wikipedia, shouldn't it be part of the Wikipedia: namespace? – Tivedshambo (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- It does? — Omegatron 16:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Quite. It's not about its use in Wikipedia alone, but about its generic use in (X)HTML. Tearlach 17:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's how it reads to me: e.g. If latitude is present, so MUST be longitude, and vice versa.. If this isn't a WP instruction then I apologise. However, bear in mind Wikipedia is not an instruction manual, – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- WP:NOT#IINFO - maybe, but that rule is really aimed at detailed instructions, like how to bake a cake. In this case it's just a stringent definition of a format, which is no more instruction than, say, the definitions of trig functions . Tearlach 18:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's how it reads to me: e.g. If latitude is present, so MUST be longitude, and vice versa.. If this isn't a WP instruction then I apologise. However, bear in mind Wikipedia is not an instruction manual, – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Of course it doesn't. Andy Mabbett 18:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Quite. It's not about its use in Wikipedia alone, but about its generic use in (X)HTML. Tearlach 17:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geo (microformat). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516074245/http://www.locify.com/ to http://www.locify.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:Geouf" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Geouf and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 19#Wikipedia:Geouf until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 14:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)